Skip to main content

Labor Department Clarifies the WARN Act Still In Place During Coronavirus Pandemic


As some readers might be aware, the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (“WARN Act”) sets out specific steps that certain employers must take when they are going to lay off a set number of workers or close a plant.  Generally speaking, an employer with 100 or more employees is required to give 60 days notice when closing a plant or engaging in a mass layoff that will last more than 6 months.  For employers with 50 employees, advance notice can be required if entire departments are laid off.

Salaried workers are entitled to notice under the WARN Act and count toward the employee threshold.  Part time workers with less than 6 months of employment are not counted toward the threshold but are entitled to notice.  Temporary workers are not entitled to notice but are counted toward the threshold.

In a FAQ published by the Labor Department, it was clarified that the WARN Act still applies during the coronavirus pandemic.  Of note, there are two exceptions that still apply to the 60 day notice requirement:  the faltering business exception and the unforeseeable business circumstances exception.  When the coronavirus initially started to become known in the U.S. several months ago, I think many employers could likely have met one of these two exceptions.  However, with the coronavirus now a part of daily life for most, I think it will start to get tougher for employers to claim one of these two exceptions to avoid the WARN Act notice requirement.

The Labor Department has clarified it will not offer individual assessment of whether the WARN Act notice requirement applies.  Rather, with each matter being evaluated on a case by case basis, the Labor Department says each matter would be determined by a private right of action.  It will be interesting to see if/how many disputes arise over the coming weeks and months in regard to the WARN Act notice requirement.

For additional information:  https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ETA/Layoff/pdfs/WARN%20FAQ%20for%20COVID19.pdf

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations