Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


Earlier this week, the Democratic Presidential candidates held another debate, the first in which former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg participated.  Readers might remember that he had been under fire in recent weeks for the use of confidentiality agreements at his company, with many accusing him of hiding behind sexual harassment issues by using the confidentiality agreements to block discussion of the topic.  At this week's debate, Senator Elizabeth Warren came after him on that very topic, charging that Bloomberg was hiding behind the confidentiality agreements and not being transparent in what actually happened at his company under his watch.  While that topic might have merited a discussion, below, there are a few more pressing matters that I think deserve the spotlight this week.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Democratic Senators Call on Amazon to Answer For Workplace Injuries

Last Monday, several Senators including Sherrod Brown, Bernie Sanders, and Tammy Baldwin sent a letter to Amazon CEO, Jeff Bezos, asking for answers as to why there have been an apparent uptick in workplace injuries at Amazon.  In the letter, Amazon was instructed to take steps to reduce the workplace injuries, including requests to minimize quotas and no longer track employee breaks.  Whether this letter will actually result in any changes at Amazon is unlikely.  However, with Senator Sanders in the midst of a much expected drawn out fight for the Democratic nomination for President, I would expect him to use his pulpit to draw continued attention to the topic.


Uber & Lyft Drivers Push Back, Demand Enforcement of AB 5 & Back Wages

It seems like hardly a week goes by without an update/development in the ongoing enforcement (and fight against) AB 5, the controversial legislation approved last year in California which codified the ABC Test making it easier to classify workers as employees rather than independent contractors.  While Uber & Lyft have taken steps to get a measure on the ballot to have voters overturn the legislation, last week over 100 Uber & Lyft drivers filed wage claims with the California Labor Commissioner’s Office, seeking to be classified as employees and reimbursed for back wages.  As Carolyn Said at The San Francisco Chronicle writes, these workers are upset, to put it mildly, that they have not seen the expected enforcement of AB 5 like they thought would happen upon passage of the legislation.


Florida Farmers Push Back Against E-Verify Bill

With Florida Congressmen and Governor Ron DeSantis making an E-Verify bill a focal point and priority, many farmers in Florida are beginning to voice their opposition.  The legislation would require farmers in the state to verify each new hire’s eligibility to work in the U.S. via the E-Verify system.  However, many of these farmers worry that the legislation would deal a crippling blow to the already meager pool of workers in the state.  Perhaps there will be some sort of compromise reached, but with Republicans holding majority control in the Legislature, if they want to push this proposal through, they likely have the votes to do so.


The #MeToo Movement Brings Change to Victoria’s Secret’s Workplace Culture

The Los Angeles Times published an article recently in which it recognized the effect that the #MeToo movement and advocacy groups (including one led by former model Sara Ziff) have had on Victoria’s Secret’s workplace culture.  As a result of these efforts, last year Victoria’s Secret implemented new policies to better protect its models from abuse and harassment.  These changes included providing private dressing rooms for models; not allowing models to be alone with a photographer or makeup person; having an independent monitor present at photo shoots to ensure compliance; and providing an ethics hotline to report abuse and harassment.  (Prior to 2018, Victoria’s Secret did not have any definitive policy in place.)  While these new policies have been met with generally positive responses, there is still criticism that these models are at a disadvantage as they do not have a union that can advocate on their behalf and be more able to bring about change (as opposed to hotel housekeepers at hotels that do have union representation.)  As a result, there are calls on upper management at L Brands Inc. (the parent company of Victoria’s Secret) to implement and model, pardon the pun, these new policies from the top down.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more