Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


It was a busy few days in trial last week, out of the office at the start of the this week, and then in depositions and trials to end the week.  While I was on the road and away from home/my office most of the past week, I could not let a Friday go by without positing this “What I’ve Been Reading Tbis Week”.  After all, I strive to be on time with these posts, unlike the reporting of the Democratic caucus results out of Iowa.  (I could not help myself.  That might have been low hanging fruit, but I could not pass up the opportunity.)

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Flagstaff to Pay State of Arizona $840,000.00 As A Result of Higher Hourly Wage Rate

Well with every piece of good news, it is inevitable that there might be some bad news not far behind.  Take this news out of Arizona:  the hourly minimum rate in Flagstaff is $13/hour (while the state’s hourly wage rate is $12/hour.)   It goes without saying that is good news for hourly workers in Flagstaff.  However, as a result of a law passed last year, cities with hourly wage rates higher than the state’s are required to reimburse the state for costs associated with the higher wage rate.  Therefore, it is estimated that Flagstaff will owe the state at least $840,000.00 over the next two years (and perhaps more, depending upon final calculations.)


Democratic Presidential Candidate Tom Steyer Recognizes Campaign Union

This past Sunday, Democratic Presidential candidate Tom Steyer announced that a staff bargaining unit with International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 2325 had been recognized.  Readers might recall that other Democratic Presidential campaigns have unionized this election cycle, including the campaigns of Mayor Pete Buttigieg, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, and Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren.  As with the unionization of the other campaigns, I am not surprised that Steyer has chosen to voluntarily recognize the union (rather than requiring an election occur.)  Whether Steyer's candidacy makes it to (and through) Super Tuesday next month remains to be seen.


During State of the Union Address, President Trump Urges Passage of Paid Leave Bill

During Tuesday’s State of the Union address, President Donald Trump took a moment to voice his support for a paid leave bill that has recently been introduced in Congress, urging the Legislators in the House chamber to pass the legislation.  Republican Senator Bill Cassidy, one of the sponsors of the bill, noted his support of President Trump’s reference to the paid leave bill during the President’s address.  It is worth noting that The Advancing Working Families Act, the paid leave bill, has bipartisan support.  Whether that is enough to get the legislation passed remains to be seen.  However, President Trump appears ready to sign it, should it reach his desk.


Implementing Sexual Harassment in the Workplace...And Including Independent Contractors?

Kara Hertzog over at HRDive wrote an article in which she pointed out that while many employers have implemented sexual harassment training in the workplace (whether by choice or because of a new regulation or law), the question turns to whether employers should include independent contributors that training.  While every workplace is different, Hertzog recommends employers play it safe and include independent contractors in the training.  The article includes three suggestions on how employers can implement the training as well.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...