Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


It seems to have been the case many weeks so far this year, but this one in particular was somewhat more hectic with work travel than the past few.  With very little spare time, I did not have much of a chance to read through articles, but the two below are worth highlighting.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Some Workers See Wage Growth (Thanks to Wage Hikes); Others See Decline

Perhaps we should call this conversation, water is wet.  After all, I do not think it should come as much of a surprise that hourly workers in states that have raised hourly wage rates have seen a 4% wage growth.  On the other hand, for workers in states that have not seen wage hikes, it also should not come as a shock that these workers have seen a - .5% wage growth.  With that being said, this study from the National Employment Law Project is Worth a read for a more nuanced discussion on the topic.


Democratic Presidential Candidate Tom Steyer Proposes $22/Hour Minimum Wage Rate

Let us call this one of the most progressive positions during the 2020 primary cycle.  Last Sunday, Democratic Presidential candidate Tom Steyer was in South Carolina, ahead of the state‘s primary in a few weeks, during which Steyer announced that he would seek to raise the federal hourly minimum wage rate to $22/hour if elected President.  Readers might recall that there has been broad support for a $15/hour minimum wage rate...but $22/hour is a whole other story.  While Steyer’s candidacy is expected to fall short, might the Democratic platform include an hourly wage rate above $15/hour?  Time will tell, although I would not be surprised if Steyer’s $22/hour wage proposal helps propel the conversation forward before the Democratic convention in Milwaukee this summer.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more