Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


It seems to have been the case many weeks so far this year, but this one in particular was somewhat more hectic with work travel than the past few.  With very little spare time, I did not have much of a chance to read through articles, but the two below are worth highlighting.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Some Workers See Wage Growth (Thanks to Wage Hikes); Others See Decline

Perhaps we should call this conversation, water is wet.  After all, I do not think it should come as much of a surprise that hourly workers in states that have raised hourly wage rates have seen a 4% wage growth.  On the other hand, for workers in states that have not seen wage hikes, it also should not come as a shock that these workers have seen a - .5% wage growth.  With that being said, this study from the National Employment Law Project is Worth a read for a more nuanced discussion on the topic.


Democratic Presidential Candidate Tom Steyer Proposes $22/Hour Minimum Wage Rate

Let us call this one of the most progressive positions during the 2020 primary cycle.  Last Sunday, Democratic Presidential candidate Tom Steyer was in South Carolina, ahead of the state‘s primary in a few weeks, during which Steyer announced that he would seek to raise the federal hourly minimum wage rate to $22/hour if elected President.  Readers might recall that there has been broad support for a $15/hour minimum wage rate...but $22/hour is a whole other story.  While Steyer’s candidacy is expected to fall short, might the Democratic platform include an hourly wage rate above $15/hour?  Time will tell, although I would not be surprised if Steyer’s $22/hour wage proposal helps propel the conversation forward before the Democratic convention in Milwaukee this summer.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more