Skip to main content

Several Large Chicken Companies Accused of Conspiring to Keep Wages Down


If there was ever a reason to cry foul, this is it.  Last week, a lawsuit was filed against several of the largest chicken producers in the country (including Tyson Foods, Sanderson Farms, and Pilgrim’s Pride, among others), on the grounds that these companies unlawfully sought to suppress wages in the industry, specifically among immigrant workers.  Wages in the industry reportedly average around $11/hour, barely placing these workers above the poverty line.

These 18 companies, which make up 90% of the chicken producers in the country, have allegedly been arranging clandestine meetings since at least 2009 in which they exchange information as to how much each company paid its line and maintenance workers.  The lawsuit alleges that detailed wage and benefits information was exchanged at these meetings so that the companies could coordinate and set wages at an even level in the the industry, without any one company paying its workers more than the others.  As well, when one company would move to expand, the other chicken producers were apparently consulted as to the appropriate wages for the new positions.  With that being said, one of the more troubling allegations centers around a claim that senior executives at these companies would chastise a rival when that other company raised wages beyond the ‘agreed upon’ rates set at these secret meetings.

The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages but is based upon interviews with former employees.  While a few of the companies have publicly denied the allegations in the lawsuit, others have not commented for the time being.  With the recent immigration raids at a few plants in Mississippi, workers on production lines have been, and likely will continue to be, in the news going forward.


For additional information:  https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-09-03/biggest-chicken-processors-accused-of-immigrant-wage-plot

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more