Skip to main content

Google Under Fire For Alleged Retaliation Against Employees


Last week, it was reported that based upon internal documentation from Google, dozens of workers at the company stated that when they filed complaints with the company's human resources department (in regard to harassment related matters), these employees were retaliated against by being demoted, pushed out, and given less desirable projects.  Current and former Google employees have backed this information up, claiming they are afraid to report workplace issues out of fear of retaliation.

Let us take a step back, though.  Readers might recall that last year, there was widespread attention given to a walkout by employees at the company when it became known that Google had paid out over $100 million to executives at the company accused of harassment in the workplace.  Now give credit where credit is due, as Google immediately thereafter announced it would overhaul its sexual misconduct policies (by eliminating required arbitration of sexual harassment and sexual assault claims) and would make an effort to support workers that raised concerns.

However, as reported last week, many current and former employees at the company feel Google has not followed through.  With that being said, Google's Vice President of People Operations commented last week that Google rigorously investigated all instances of inappropriate conduct that were reported and were taking steps to make the investigation process more transparent.

In a politically charged environment where many Democratic candidates for President are eager to push back against large scale employers, such as Google, I would not be surprised to see this matter gain further traction in the coming weeks and months.  Stay tuned.


For additional information:  https://www.vox.com/recode/2019/9/9/20853647/google-employee-retaliation-harassment-me-too-exclusive

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...