Skip to main content

NLRB Issues Surprising Hault to Union Election at Tennessee Volkswagen Plant


In an announcement that caught many by surprise, last Friday, the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") granted a request by Volkswagen to put an indefinite hold on a union election at its Chattanooga, Tennessee plant.  As a bit of background, workers at the pant had filed a union election petition last month with the NLRB seeking to have the United Auto Workers represent them.  Volkswagen sought to stop the union election on the grounds that all workers at the Volkswagen plant should have been included, rather than just a smaller group of workers.

Without providing an explanation for its decision, NLRB Chairman John Ring and Member Marvin Kaplan issued a single sentence opinion in which it was announced that the union election would not proceed.  Member Lauren McFerran, the lone Democrat on the NLRB, issued a dissenting opinion that Volkswagen "has not established that such extraordinary relief is necessary."

This is another chapter in the drawn out saga of unionization efforts at the Chattanooga plant.  Volkswagen had previously argued that an election among a small group of maintenance workers in 2015 precluded another vote.  (A year must pass after a union certification before there can be another union election.  This year timeframe is intended to allow adequate time for bargaining.  Volkswagen argued that the year ban was still in place since it had not technically started bargaining with the union...on the grounds that the election was not proper since it only included a small group of workers at the plant rather than all workers.)

I do not need to say that last Friday's announcement from the NLRB is yet another setback for unionization efforts at the plant.  Where things go from here is difficult to predict, but this is yet another roadblock that has been put in front of the UAW and pro-union workers at the plant.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more