Skip to main content

NLRB's Associate General Counsel: Rideshare Drivers Are Independent Contractors


In an advice memo that could shake up the ongoing independent contractor v. employee classification dispute over rideshare drivers, the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") Associate General Counsel Jayme L. Sophir, stated that rideshare drivers are independent contractors rather than employees.

The memo, dated April 16, 2019 but not released until yesterday, addresses several cases submitted to the NLRB for advice as to whether rideshare drivers are employees of the company they work for or instead are independent contractors.  The advice memo noted that when applying the factors set forth from the SuperShuttle DFW decision, the great weight of evidence established that rideshare drivers were independent contractors.  Notably, rideshare drivers set their own hours, own their own cars, and are free to work for another competitor if they choose.  Consequently, when applying a common law agency test, the Associate General Counsel concluded that these rideshare drivers should be classified as independent contractors.

In reaching this conclusion, it follows that drivers at Uber, Lyft, and other rideshare companies are excluded from federal workplace organizing activities (such as joining or forming a union) and therefore are not protected by the National Labor Relations Act.  As a result, these rideshare drivers would also be without the ability to file unfair labor practice charges with the NLRB.

So what does this mean for rideshare drivers?  In short, it is not good news.  This advice memo deals another blow to rideshare drivers that have long fought to be recognized as employees (and also be given the ability to unionize.)   Readers will recall that the Department of Labor had recently issued an opinion letter which held that gig workers at an unidentified company were independent contractors rather than employees.  Some have speculated that if rideshare drivers were recognized as employees, companies such as Uber & Lyft would see labor costs rise 20 to 30 percent.  With both companies recently going public (and having somewhat disappointing IPO's), an advice memo that went the opposite direction (holding that rideshare drivers should be classified as employees) could have sent both Uber & Lyft stocks spiraling lower.  For the time being, this advice memo is good new for both companies.


For a copy of the advice memo:  http://src.bna.com/Ibt


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more