Skip to main content

NLRB General Counsel Just Made It Easier For Nonmembers to Challenge Agency Fees


At the end of April, National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") General Counsel, Peter Robb, issued a memorandum in which he wrote that nonunion members that pay union dues will be able to more easily challenge the expenses required to be paid for the costs of collective bargaining and other nonpolitical activities.  (Section 8(a)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act allows employers and unions, in non right to work states, to enter into agreements that require union membership as a condition of employment.  These agreements allow unions to collect forced fees (a/k/a "agency fees") from all workers.  These agency fees are intended to prevent "free riders" from benefiting from the collective bargaining of the union without providing any financial support/compensation to the union itself.  However, certain union expenses have been found to not be chargeable to nonmembers, including the cost of lobbying, salaries, and benefits.)

The memorandum notes that going forward, workers that object to paying for particular union expenses do not have to explain why they should not have been charged nor require them to give the NLRB evidence or investigative leads to support their challenge; a change from prior NLRB General Counsels.  With prior NLRB General Counsels calling on workers to provide this information (as to their objection to particular union expenses), the burden was placed on workers to contest particular union expenses.  However, under this new guidance, the burden instead shifts to unions to provide evidence as to why a particular union expense charged to nonmembers is permitted by law.

This memorandum was predictably met with both applause and disdain.  Patrick Semmens, spokesman for the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, stated the burden shifting in regard to these union fees put the burden of proof back on the union officials "...where it belongs when it comes to justifying the amount of forced fees."  On the other side of the coin, the change in policy could lead to unions having to expend countless resources to rebut meritless challenges filed by nonmembers.  Regardless of where you stand on the matter, this is a favorable turn of events for those opposed to agency fees.


For a copy of General Counsel Robb's memorandum:  http://src.bna.com/HTW

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more