Skip to main content

One to Keep An Eye On: Kenney v. Helix TCS (Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals)


As with many employment and labor law related cases (and bills) being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.

This is one to keep an eye on.


Facts:  Helix TCS ("Helix") is in the business of providing security, inventory control, and compliance services to the marijuana industry in Colorado.  Between February 2016 and April 2017, Robert Kenney ("Kenney") worked at Helix as a security guard.  Kenney's duties included patrolling assigned locations, investigating and documenting all facility related incidents, and enforcing client, local, state, and federal policies and regulations.  Although Helix classified Kenney as an exempt employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), Kenney claimed that he and other similarly situated employees frequently performed non-exempt job duties.  As a result, Kenney filed suit and alleged that he was not an exempt employee under any applicable exemption of the FLSA and was thus entitled to overtime compensation.

A District Court in Colorado found in favor of Kenney and rejected an argument by Helix that it was excused from complying with the FLSA because its business practice may be in violation of federal law.  (Readers will likely recall that while 33 states and the District of Columbia have passed laws that legalize medical marijuana, there is yet to be a federal law legalizing medical marijuana use as well).  Helix proceeded to appeal to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Issue:  Does an employer have to comply with federal regulations, including the FLSA, even if its business practice is in violation of federal law?

Current Status:  Back in mid November, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments on the matter.

Looking Ahead:  Since oral arguments were heard last month, things have been relatively quiet.  I would expect a ruling from the Court soon, perhaps within the next month or two.  Based upon the tenor of how oral arguments played out as well as the District Court's ruling, I would expect the Tenth Circuit to affirm the ruling and uphold judgment for Kenney.

And for readers that have been following marijuana in the workplace related cases, such as Coats v. Dish Network and Callaghan v. Darlington Fabrics, consider this one a "companion case" of sorts.


For additional information:  https://www.courtlistener.com/audio/59993/kenney-v-helix-tcs/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more