Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Janus v. AFSCME.  Readers have likely heard about that case and the significant impact it has had in regard to unions in the country ever since the United States Supreme Court issued its decision this past summer.  A recent case in Washington state that came about as a result of Janus is well worth a review, if for no other reason than similar cases are likely to follow suit...regardless of the Court's dismissal of the claim.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


A Few Tips on How to "Control" An Office Holiday Party

Robin Shea wrote a great article a few weeks ago that offers employees six things to keep in mind to help control an office holiday party and limit potential liability that often arises with these type of work events.  One idea in particular, to have reliable employees serve as "chaperones" to help keep an eye on things and tactfully step in, could be of use to some employers...especially when alcohol is involved.  As many readers have likely seen, having alcohol at a workplace event can often lead to potential issues popping up.  Robin's idea to have some employees refrain from drinking and instead help keep an eye on things is not a bad idea to consider.  Notwithstanding that particular tip for employers, Robin's other five thoughts are well worth a review.


Incoming Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to Pay Interns More Than Minimum Wage

Democratic Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, from New York, made news when she announced late last week that she would pay her Congressional interns.  Not only did that announcement garner attention, but so did her insistence that she would also pay her interns more than the minimum wage rate.  This is a shift compared to how interns on Capitol Hill have traditionally been unpaid.  What changed?  A D.C. nonprofit, Pay Our Interns, was able to lobby Congress to appropriate a small amount of funding to pay Congressional interns in both the House & Senate.  As some have noted, given that many in Congress have advocated for a higher minimum wage rate, namely $15/hour, having the ability to now pay Congressional interns avoids a potential hypocritical situation if unpaid interns remained the norm.


Washington District Court Dismisses Suit Seeking Unions Pay Back Fees Following Janus Ruling

After the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in June in Janus v. AFSCME, it was inevitable that lawsuits would be filed seeking that unions return the fees collected from non-union members.  At the end of November, the United States District Court, Western District of Washington at Tacoma issued a decision in Danielson v. AFSCME in which it held that the union, the AFSCME, did not have to return those funds collected.  As some have pointed out, this was a significant victory for public sector unions but likely not the last time this type of lawsuit will be filed...not to mention that the plaintiff might appeal the District Court's ruling to the Ninth Circuit.  Stay tuned.


The California Cannabis Industry vs. Unions

Erin Mundahl at InsideSources wrote an article earlier this week that took a look at the looming fight between employers in the California cannabis industry and labor unions.  As Erin notes, many employers in the cannabis industry are not keen on the idea of unions taking hold in the workplace.  However, workers at several cannabis farms have already unionized with unionization possible at several other farms.  One stumbling block to unionization taking hold has been the high turnover rate in the industry which has prevented unions from obtaining the necessary majority vote.  With that being said, it appears possible (if not likely) that unionization in the cannabis industry will increase in the coming years.  This is one area to keep an eye on, for those looking for a barometer as the the continued viability of unions in the workplace.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...