Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


I intentionally do not focus on employment and labor law matters outside of the U.S. for the simple reason that although many developments in other countries are often quite intriguing, they more often than not do not have much applicability to developments here in the U.S.  With that being said, a week or so ago I highlighted the labor reforms that French President Emmanuel Macron is attempting to implement.  And now this week, we have a development out of Europe in regard to e-mail privacy of employees in the workplace.  At this rate, international employment and labor law developments might just deserve their own dedicated post...

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Are You a Worker in Europe? If So, Your Employer Is Now Required to Notify You If They Monitor Your E-mail

This past Tuesday, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights issued a decision in which it held that companies in Europe can monitor their employees' e-mails if the employees are notified in advance.  This 11 - 6 ruling in favor of protecting an employees' privacy comes about after a Romanian employee used Yahoo Messenger at work to discuss personal matters and was subsequently fired a few weeks after he was confronted by his employer.  I question whether employees in the U.S. would be entitled to the same "protections" that employees in Europe are now afforded...but perhaps some cities (such as San Francisco, Seattle, or New York City) which have adopted pro-employee policies in the past would approve a similar measure.


A Followup On the Case That "Ended" the Viability of the Proposed New Overtime Rule

Lexology has a brief, albeit clear cut, analysis of State of Nevada et. al. v. United States Department of Labor et. al. which is the case which effectively tabled the proposed new overtime rule.   While this note does not include an update in regard to the likelihood that the decision will not be appealed, this gives readers a good insight into the case and what the impact of the ruling means for workers across the country that would have potentially benefited from the new overtime rule.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more