Skip to main content

Updated: New Overtime Rule Appears To Be (Permanently) Shelved


As many readers are likely aware, during the Obama administration, a new overtime rule was introduced which would have resulted in massive increases in salary for many workers across the country.  Under the proposed regulation, it would have required employers to pay overtime to workers that earned less than $47,476.00 per year (up from the current "cut off" of $23,660.00 per year).  Critics of this proposed increased argued it would decimate the labor market, result in an increase in costs passed on to consumers, and place a tremendous burden on employers.

Shortly before the overtime rule was set to take place (on December 1, 2016) a preliminary injunction was issued by a Federal Court Judge in November of last year which put the overtime rule on hold.  (Interesting to note that the Judge, Amos Mazzant, had been appointed by President Obama).  After President Donald Trump took office, the Department of Labor appeared willing to back away from defending the overtime rule.  (Note, this was contrary to the Obama era Department of Labor which "strongly disagreed" with the issuance of the injunction).

In recent weeks, Judge Mazzant granted summary judgment in favor of the business plaintiffs that sought the injunction.  Shortly thereafter, the Department of Justice asked the Fifth Circuit to dismiss an appeal (in regard to the injunction and enforcement of the overtime rule) as the granting of summary judgment by Judge Mazzant rendered the appeal moot.

At this point, the new overtime rule proposed by the Obama administration appears to be permanently off the table.  The question then turns to what (if anything) the Trump administration would do to raise the overtime threshold.  Time will tell, but many scholars that closely follow the matter expect there to at least be some increase in the overtime threshold (although likely much lower than what had previously been proposed during the Obama administration).

Stay tuned.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more