Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: A Look Back Edition


I came across a couple articles this week (namely on union and labor law related issues) that serve as somewhat of an update to prior posts.  While I could highlight several articles on other topics, I think it is appropriate to dedicate this post to the recent decision of a union president to run for governor of Iowa as well the continued efforts of Columbia University graduate students to have the University bargain with their union.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


SEIU Local President Formally Announces Run For Iowa Governor

Readers might recall that earlier this year, SEIU Local 199 President Cathy Glasson announced that she was "exploring" a run for Governor.  On Tuesday, she made it official and formally announced she was running for Governor of Iowa in 2018.  She has based her campaign in part upon a pledge to raise minimum wage rates in the state to $15/hour and expand union rights.  Currently there are six other Democrats running for the nomination.  It will be interesting to see if Glasson can emerge from a rather crowded field and gain the momentum to get the Democratic nomination.


Increased Pressure Put on Columbia University to Bargain With Graduate Student Union

On Wednesday, a press conference and forum was held by Columbia University graduate students, pro-union backers, and several New York politicians in an effort to get Columbia University to bargain with their union.  About a year ago, the NLRB issued a decision in which it held that Columbia University graduate students could organize and form a union.  Columbia University has remained resistant to that decision while they consider how they want to proceed.  As always, this one is likely far from over but the Columbia University graduate students have a lot of weight in their corner:  namely the NLRB decision and a bevy of politicians and activists starting to beat the drum.  Stay tuned.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per