Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Excuse the brevity of this post, but I am wrapping up breakfast at Whole Foods this morning before heading into a mediation.  Thankfully I have had less time on the road for work the past few weeks so I have been able to read through more articles than normal.  Perhaps one of the more interesting articles had to do with a proposed 'answer' for why wages in the fast food industry have long since stagnated.  While there is likely no definitive answer as to why wages in this industry have, for the most part, failed to take off, this New York Times article gives some thought provoking insight.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.



Rachel Abrams at The New York Times wrote an article this past Wednesday that shed some light on why hourly wages in the fast food industry have failed to take off (as much as some would like.). There is apparently a clause in many fast food franchise agreements that prohibits franchisees of chains such as Burger King, Carl's Jr., and Pizza Hut from hiring employees away from one another.  (As a result, one Burger King franchisee would be prohibited from hiring away an employee from another Burger King franchisee.)  While these clauses are not actually agreed to or signed off by employees (as they are found only in the franchise agreements with the parent companies that franchisees sign), these clauses have tended to prevent 'bidding wars' among franchisees for employees and also limit the negotiating power employees have when they attempt to obtain a higher hourly wage rate.  Fascinating article for those unfamiliar with these clauses.



An interesting study was released last month which reported that approximately 90% of U.S. House offices do not pay their interns with nearly half of U.S. Senate offices failing to do so as well.  Interesting to note the political breakdown by party however in terms of the U.S. House offices:  about 10% of Republican offices pay their interns while only about 4% of Democratic offices do so.  For a party that often leads the charge on liveable wages, 'Fight for $15', etc., Democrats in the U.S. House are woefully lacking, per this report.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...