Skip to main content

Today is Equal Pay Day: A Closer Look at the Issue


For those who might not be aware, today, April 12, is Equal Pay Day.  I have noted in recent months how equal pay has become a focal point on the campaign trail.  Well, at least on the Democratic side.  With that being said, given the fact that a female candidate is running for President (and could very well win in November), equal pay has taken on a heightened focus as of late.  I think it is appropriate to point readers to a few articles on the topic in order to give a little background on the topic.



Kathleen Turner (yes, that Kathleen Turner) wrote an article for the Huffington Post which highlights the extraordinary work that is still left to be done on the equal pay front.  Studies have shown that women earn on average 79 cents for every dollar that men make.  Given the long, hard struggle that it has been to get to simply get to that point, the fight is not over yet.



Readers might remember that several United States Women's soccer players filed a wage discrimination suit recently.  Alex Morgan, one of the parties to that suit, has penned an article on why she is continuing her fight for equal pay, regardless of how long it takes.



Lydia Dishman has a very well researched article on just how expansive the equal pay issue really is.  By going beyond the basic 79 cents compared to every dollar statistic that is routinely cited, Dishman points readers to a range of other factors that impacts pay, such as the age, race, and ethnicity of female workers.  Well worth a read!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per