Skip to main content

The Presidential Candidates & Minimum Wage


Minimum wage has become a hot button issue on the campaign trail this year, particularly on the Democratic side.  Given the increased importance this topic has gotten, and the fact that is primary day in several states today, I think it is helpful to see where all the candidates still running for President stand on the the issue of minimum wage (both on the federal side and at the state level).

Since Democrats have been the vocal leaders on the issue, it makes sense to start there.

Hillary Clinton - Secretary Clinton recently clarified her position on the minimum wage issue and said she would support a $15/hour federal minimum wage put forth by Democrats if it included stipulations such as a gradual phase in and if it would include lower wages in areas with low costs of living.  Secretary Clinton has also recently supported state wide efforts to raise the minimum wage in states such as New York.  She has suggested that the minimum wage hike in New York (which will gradually see $15/hour around New York City and $12.50/hour in upstate areas) should be used as a model for other states.  (http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2016/04/hillary_clinton_dismisses_dona.html).  Readers might remember that Oregon adopted a similar minimum wage rate recently, with higher minimum wage rates being phased in for workers in the Portland area and lower rates being phased in for workers in other parts of the state (with lower costs of living).

Bernie Sanders - Senator Sanders has long been a vocal proponent of minimum wage increases around the country.  In fact, at the most recent Democratic debate, he took Secretary Clinton to task for allegedly not doing enough to support $15/hour.  Unsurprisingly, Senator Sanders is in favor of raising the federal minimum wage to $15/hour and has vowed to sign a bill into law that would do so if elected President.  I do not think it would be a shock to anyone that Senator Sanders supports state wide efforts to raise minimum wages rates around the country as well.  (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bernie-sanders-minimum-wage_us_5714fc02e4b0060ccda3b8df). 



Not to be outdone, the remaining Republican candidates have addressed the minimum wage issue in some form or fashion.  However, if you have watched the prior debates or seen some of their stump speeches on the campaign trail, it is evident that this is not an issue of the forefront of their campaigns.

Donald Trump - When New York announced its minimum wage increase recently, Trump came out in opposition saying it would hurt New York's ability to compete.  (http://www.lohud.com/story/news/politics/politics-on-the-hudson/2016/04/15/interview-trump-says-wage-hike-makes-ny-uncompetitive/83092046/).  With his comments on the federal minimum wage being relatively scarce, I think it is safe to say he would oppose a raise on all fronts when it comes to minimum wage.

Ted Cruz - Senator Cruz has stated that the concept of minimum wage is "bad policy" and argued that states should be free to set their own minimum wages.  (Note, it appears he is not in favor a federal minimum wage at this time.).  By raising the minimum wage, he has suggested that the most vulnerable workers in the country, such as young, less educated, low income, minorities, lose their jobs.  Senator Cruz has also stated that a continued increase in the minimum wage will ultimately result in companies replacing workers with machines.  (http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/apr/15/ted-cruz-minimum-wage-systematically-hurts-most-vu/).  Granted, he might not be wrong on the idea that at some point, employers would look to phase out employees if the cost of machines/computers became a cheaper option.  I do not think that idea is too far fetched...

John Kasich - Like Trump, Governor Kasich has limited his comments on minimum wage.  However, he did recently comment that the minimum wage should be increased based upon "what can be handled by the economy."  (Perhaps he would subscribe to Secretary Clinton's proposal for a scaled minimum wage, depending in part upon the cost of living in a particular area?).  As with Senator Cruz, Governor Kasich also expressed concern for raising the minimum wage to such a high level that it would result in businesses having to let employees go in order to be able to afford to pay higher wages.  (http://www.bizjournals.com/albany/news/2016/04/11/kasich-minimum-wage-increases-shouldnt-be.html). 


As with any politician, any of these five could change their positions over the coming weeks/months on the issue of minimum wage.  Depending upon who gets the Democratic and Republican nominations for President, those particular candidates might move more towards the middle of the aisle and adopt a more centrist approach to appeal to the general electorate ahead of the November elections.  Perhaps Kasich's proposal of "what can be handled by the economy" along with Clinton's embrace of a more scaled wage rate depending upon the cost of living in certain areas are a step in that direction?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more