Skip to main content

New York State and San Francisco Pass Paid Leave Laws


Earlier this week, it was announced that New York State and San Francisco both passed laws that will provide paid leave for workers in the state and city.  Given the increased attention that paid sick leave laws have gotten the past several months (in particular by both Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton who are campaigning for the Democratic nomination for President), this is a huge development.

In New York, the paid sick leave law will compensate parents for up to twelve weeks of leave.  With the approval of this paid leave law, New York becomes the fourth state in the U.S. to implement some form of paid leave to workers in the state.  (Note, the approval of this paid leave law was included in part of the budget deal that included a rise in the state's minimum wage).  Under this paid leave policy, it will begin to be implemented in 2018 and cover 50% of a worker's average wages for up to 8 weeks.  When fully implemented, the policy will cover 67% of a worker's average wages for up to 12 weeks.  It is important to note, however, that New York will impose a cap on the money paid out to workers each week and the leave payments in this case would be funded by an employee payroll reduction.

In San Francisco, employers will be required to provide workers with six weeks of fully paid parental leave.  San Francisco has become the first U.S. city to approve this type of measure.  Note, the measure was approved by the city's board of supervisors and is awaiting approval from Mayor Ed Lee.  This paid leave law will coincide with California's existing parental leave policy (which currently covers 55% of a new parent's income during his/her leave).  This measure will require employers to pay the remaining 45% of en employee's income.

As expected, business leaders and business groups in both New York and San Francisco have been vocal in their opposition to these new laws.  As opponents of the expanded paid leave laws have argued, these new measures hurt small businesses and prohibit growth in the private sector as a result of an increase in costs passed on to the employer.  

With that being said, even in light of the opposition to these paid leave laws, New York and San Francisco have made major headlines with the approval of these measures.  The only question now is which state and/or city follows their lead?




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more