Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: USWNT Lawsuit Edition


Yesterday, it was announced that the United States Women's National Team ("USWNT") filed a wage discrimination lawsuit against the United States Soccer Federation.  The players alleged in the lawsuit that they are paid almost four times less than the United States Men's National Team, despite generating almost $20 million more in revenue last year.  This is a huge story and one that continues to grow.  I will plan on covering it more next week, but in the meantime, I wanted to point readers to a few articles on the topic.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


President of United States Soccer Federation Responds to Lawsuit

Joe Prince-Wright has a good article in regard to a conference call yesterday in which Sunil Gulati, President of the United States Soccer Federation ("USSF"), stated that United States soccer holds the USWNT in high regard and would be willing to compensate them fairly when it comes time to negotiate a new collective bargaining agreement.  With that being said, Gulati pointed out that many factors go into determining compensation for male and female soccer players...thus why female players earned less than their male counterparts.  USSF's outside counsel, Russell Sauer, has noted that he was taken by surprise to find out the the lawsuit alleged that the USSF would not give the women's team equal pay.  Note, neither of these statements are official answers to the lawsuit...but it gives you an idea that at least on the surface, the USSF is willing to work with the women's team to resolve the issue.  Time will tell whether that is actually the case.
 

Bernie Sanders & Hillary Clinton Announce Support for USWNT Lawsuit

The two remaining Democratic candidates for President tweeted their support for the USWNT lawsuit yesterday.  This is not much of a surprise, given that these two candidates have continually advocated for equal pay over the course of the campaign.  Perhaps it is more surprising that none of the three remaining Republican candidates for President have come out in support (or opposition) to this lawsuit.  Given the fact that at least one Republican candidate, Donald Trump, is apparently having issues winning over female voters, his support of this lawsuit could go a long way to help him mend fences with this voting bloc.



SI has an interesting note on former United State's men's captain Landon Donovan who voiced his support for the USWNT.  In a tweet yesterday afternoon, Donovan stated that the "USWNT absolutely deserve to be treated fairly in all ways."  He followed that up with a tweet that stated "Both USMNT and USWNT should be paid commensurate w/the revenues they produce, not based upon what the other makes."  As noted in the lawsuit, the USWNT claim they brought in $20 million more in revenue last year than the USMNT...assuming the numbers check out, Donovan is in support of the women's team receiving additional compensation.  Given his high profile and stature as a former player, his support lends a great deal of credibility to the USWNT's lawsuit.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per