Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: Minimum Wage Edition


This week I came across several articles dealing with the minimum wage movement that is happening in towns, cities, and states across the country.  In fact, at the most recent Democratic Presidential debate this past Sunday, all the candidates stated that raising wages would be a top priority in the first 100 days of their administration (note that Senator Bernie Sanders and Governor Martin O'Malley both stated they supported $15.00 per hour while Senator Clinton did not 'commit' to a specific hourly rate.)  Given the increased coverage this movement has started to receive, I thought it would be a good time to dedicate this post to the topic.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


Santa Monica City Council Approves Minimum Wage Hike

Earlier this month, the Santa Monica City Council approved a minimum wage hike that would raise wages at most businesses in the city to $15.00 per hour by 2020.  It is interesting to note that  businesses would also be required to provide paid leave for employees beyond the minimum three days that California currently requires.  Before this new ordinance becomes official, it will have to go before the City Council for a second reading.  In this instance, six council members voted in favor while one member abstained.



Boston.com has a note on former Republican Presidential candidate Mitt Romney's recent comments in support of a higher federal minimum wage rate.  As the article highlights, Romney has championed a higher minimum wage rate for several years and has encouraged his party to take up the fight.  Readers might remember that in recent months, particularly at the Republican presidential debates, there has been little support for a higher federal minimum wage from most Republicans.  I question whether Romney has much influence to insert the minimum wage discussion into the Republican platform...but interesting nonetheless to see him raise the issue.



The Oregonian has provided details on a recent announcement from Oregon Governor Kate Brown who has proposed raising minimum wage rates in the state.  Under the compromise plan, two minimum wage rates would be set for Oregon:  one rate for workers in the Portland metro area and another rate for workers in the rest of the state.  For workers in Portland, the minimum wage rate would top out at $15.25 and workers in the rest of the state would see wages top out at $13.50.  Note that under this plan, the first increases would take effect in January 2017.  It goes without saying that this is a relatively progressive minimum wage proposal!



I rarely come across labor & employment law matters from Alaska...but this is a potentially big development.  As reported by the Associated Press, Alaskan state Senator Johnny Ellis has proposed raising the minimum wage in the state to $15 per hour.  This comes on the heels of voters approving a minimum wage hike back in 2014 that has put the current minimum wage rate in Alaska at $9.75 per hour.  This one is still in the early stages, but it will be interesting to see it develop.



Scott Thistle over at The Maine Sun Journal wrote a recent update on the minimum wage movement in Maine.  Recently, Mainers for Fair Wages, have collected more than 80,000 petition signatures to get a minimum wage issue on the ballot this year.  Under the proposal, Maine's current minimum wage of $7.50 per hour would increase to $12 per hour by 2025.  It is still too early to know how this one will end up, but it is one to keep an eye on this year.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per