Skip to main content

New Laws for 2016: Accomomodation Request a Protected Activity (CA)


Last summer, California Governor Jerry Brown signed a bill into law, Assembly Bill No. 987, which amended California's Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA").  Under this amendment, an employer is prohibited from retaliating and/or otherwise discriminating against a person that requests an accommodation as a result of his/her disability or religious belief, regardless of whether the request for accommodation is granted.

For those not familiar with California labor & employment laws, this bill was a result of a 2013 California Court of Appeal case that held a fired employee could proceed with a lawsuit against an employer who allegedly discriminated against the employee based upon his association with his disabled sister to whom he planned to donate a kidney.  In that case, Rope v. Auto-Chlor System of Washington, Inc., an employee was hired by Auto-Chlor and informed them that he would need time off to donate a kidney to his sister.  The employee requested time off for the transplant but was continually told by management that they would "look into it."  The employee also told Auto-Chlor that he might need some accommodation upon his return from leave.  Although the employee had satisfactory performance reviews, Auto-Chlor terminated him.  As a result of a lack of prior California caselaw on the matter, the Court looked to the Seventh Circuit and held that the employee could proceed with his suit as a result of apparent discrimination by Auto-Chlor.

Note, this law became effective January 1, 2016.


A copy of Assembly Bill No. 987 can be found here:  https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160AB987

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie Vetoes Minimum Wage Hike

A few months ago, readers might remember that I pointed out that the New Jersey Legislature had voted to approve a minimum wage hike in the state .  Under the approved legislation, the minimum wage rate would rise to $10.10/hour in the next year and at least $15/hour over the next five.  (The current minimum wage rate in the state is $8.38/hour).  In that article, I had noted that the bill was then going to go before Governor Chris Christie for his approval or veto. As I had suggested previously, I thought that the Governor would likely veto the bill based upon his prior actions and comments on similar legislation.  Well, a few days ago, Governor Christie did just that and vetoed the bill on the grounds that it "would trigger an escalation of wages that will make doing business in New Jersey unfathomable."  Pointing to the increase in hourly minimum wage rates, the Governor referred to the bill as a "really radical increase."  (It is interesting to c...
Post a Comment
Read more