Skip to main content

Tennis Pro Eugenie Bouchard Files Suit as a Result of Unsafe Work Environment


Note:  A loyal reader of this blog pointed this issue out to me previously and thought it would make for a good post.  Having reviewed the issue myself, I certainly agree and think this is one that readers would enjoy!


Late last year, tennis pro Eugenie Bouchard filed a lawsuit against the United States Tennis Association after she slipped and fell in a locker room during the U.S. Open tennis tournament in New York.  According to her complaint, Bouchard claims her fall was caused by a "slippery, foreign and dangerous substance" on the floor in the women's locker room that was negligently allowed to exist, in spite of the danger the substance posed.  As a result of her fall, Bouchard said she hit her head and suffered a concussion which forced her to withdraw from the U.S. Open and a few other tournaments.

I highlight this case so employers can take note that in the workplace, steps should be taken to ensure a safe work environment.  In this instance, if the United States Tennis Association allegedly allowed a dangerous work condition to exist and failed to take steps to protect those who came in contact with the area, potential liability exists.  If true, that spells big trouble.  Bouchard claimed that as a result of her fall, her world tennis ranking has dropped 13 points and is likely to continue to drop.  To make matters potentially worse for the United States Tennis Association, Bouchard had been named the world's most marketable athlete in 2015; a standing that could be in jeopardy if she is unable to compete at the level needed to maintain a "marketable athlete status".

If an employee is injured at work and can start to show not only a loss of income, but a potential windfall that they expected to make had they been able to perform their job, that puts an employer in a difficult position.  Any good plaintiff's attorney would point a jury to the fact that as a result of the employer's negligence, wanton and willful disregard for a dangerous situation, etc, etc, the employee has been irreparably harmed not only physically, but also economically.  That translates into a potentially enormous judgment against a negligent employer.  One thing this case goes to show you, even in a "high stakes" situation with multi million dollar pro athletes, an unsafe workplace can prove to be trouble for an employer.
 

Special thanks to Pro Tennis Law for a copy of the complaint:
https://protennislaw.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/bouchard-eugenie-complaint.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more