Skip to main content

Tennis Pro Eugenie Bouchard Files Suit as a Result of Unsafe Work Environment


Note:  A loyal reader of this blog pointed this issue out to me previously and thought it would make for a good post.  Having reviewed the issue myself, I certainly agree and think this is one that readers would enjoy!


Late last year, tennis pro Eugenie Bouchard filed a lawsuit against the United States Tennis Association after she slipped and fell in a locker room during the U.S. Open tennis tournament in New York.  According to her complaint, Bouchard claims her fall was caused by a "slippery, foreign and dangerous substance" on the floor in the women's locker room that was negligently allowed to exist, in spite of the danger the substance posed.  As a result of her fall, Bouchard said she hit her head and suffered a concussion which forced her to withdraw from the U.S. Open and a few other tournaments.

I highlight this case so employers can take note that in the workplace, steps should be taken to ensure a safe work environment.  In this instance, if the United States Tennis Association allegedly allowed a dangerous work condition to exist and failed to take steps to protect those who came in contact with the area, potential liability exists.  If true, that spells big trouble.  Bouchard claimed that as a result of her fall, her world tennis ranking has dropped 13 points and is likely to continue to drop.  To make matters potentially worse for the United States Tennis Association, Bouchard had been named the world's most marketable athlete in 2015; a standing that could be in jeopardy if she is unable to compete at the level needed to maintain a "marketable athlete status".

If an employee is injured at work and can start to show not only a loss of income, but a potential windfall that they expected to make had they been able to perform their job, that puts an employer in a difficult position.  Any good plaintiff's attorney would point a jury to the fact that as a result of the employer's negligence, wanton and willful disregard for a dangerous situation, etc, etc, the employee has been irreparably harmed not only physically, but also economically.  That translates into a potentially enormous judgment against a negligent employer.  One thing this case goes to show you, even in a "high stakes" situation with multi million dollar pro athletes, an unsafe workplace can prove to be trouble for an employer.
 

Special thanks to Pro Tennis Law for a copy of the complaint:
https://protennislaw.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/bouchard-eugenie-complaint.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more