Skip to main content

Tampa Bay: First it Was the Pom Poms, Now its the Food Vendors


Oh what a rough year for the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.  First, a former Tampa Bay cheerleader sued the team earlier this year for alleged wage and hour violations for failure to pay minimum wage.  (Tampa Bay Cheerleader Lawsuit).  Then, there have been the actual games this season which have bordered on embarrassing.  Now, there is an issue over the food vendors at the stadium and how they were compensated.  

Late last month, a story broke in Florida about several professional sports teams (along with the Daytona 500 and the Florida state fair) using a local shelter to provide food vendors to work at games and then the food vendors subsequently gave their wages to the shelter in return for free food and a place to live.  

In this instance, New Beginnings is a shelter in Florida that houses many drug and alcohol addicted residents.  The arrangement saw New Beginnings "supply" teams, such as the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Tampa Bay Rays, and Tampa Bay Lightning, with New Beginnings shelter residents to work games and after the workers had been paid for their work, the money went directly to New Beginnings.  In return for the residents turning over their pay, New Beginnings gave these workers shelter and food.  A report from the Tampa Bay Times found that New Beginnings brought in $932,816 in income last year.   

Getting down to brass tacks, it is not illegal to compensate workers with food and shelter.  However, in order to do so, a company must provide evidence that the value of their compensation equals or exceeds what the workers would earn through federal minimum wage.  This will be an interesting issue to see unfold.  At this time, no lawsuit has been filed, but the Department of Justice has gotten involved and begun to investigate.

UPDATE:  After I wrote the above post, I came across a Deadspin article that stated the Tampa Bay Buccaneers have since decided to end its relationship with New Beginnings in regard to using these particular "employees".  That does not necessarily mean that any investigation will stop or impending charges will be halted, however.  This will be one to continue to keep an eye on.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more