Skip to main content

YOLO Indeed: 100 Hugs & a Kiss Do Not Amount to Sexual Harassment


Zetwick v. County of Yolo - United States District Court, Eastern District of California


Facts:  Victoria Zetwick was a former corrections officer in Yolo County's Sheriff's Department.  During the course of her 14 years there, she alleged that her employer violated Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and subjected her to sexual harassment after he gave her at least 100 hugs and a kiss.  Zetwick claimed that the Sheriff hugged her at least 100 times in "awkward, unsolicited, and unwelcome" encounters.  As for the kiss?  The Sheriff apparently gave her a kiss half on the corner of her lips and half on her cheek. Zetwick subsequently filed a Government Claim in February 2012 and the Sheriff apparently never hugged or kissed her again. 

Holding:  The District Court granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment on the grounds that Zetwick could not establish a valid sexual harassment claim.  In order to reach this conclusion, the Court pointed to the fact that this behavior was common in Zetwick's workplace.  Zetwick had acknowledged that she was not the only person subjected to the hugs.  Zetwick even admitted to hugging other deputies, corrections officers, and supervisors at her work.  

The Court further found that the Sheriff's hugs were not exclusively directed towards women, as the Sheriff also hugged male employees in the office.

As for the kiss?  The Court held that was not enough for a sexual harassment claim to succeed as the kiss was apparently in the presence of Zetwick's husband and was done to congratulate her on her recent marriage.

Judgment:  The District Court granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment and held that the complained of hugs and kiss by Zetwick were not enough for her to prevail on her sexual harassment claim as this conduct, taken as a whole, was commonplace in Zetwick's workplace.

The Takeaway:  Well that is certainly an interesting case.  Without a doubt, Yolo is the right name for this county.  I would not suggest that employers go out and engage in this same behavior.  I think this holding should be read rather narrowly and seen as more of a fact specific ruling.  I cannot think of a lot of courts that would find this type of behavior to be generally acceptable; I certainly would think that over 100 hugs and a kiss in the office (that are unsolicited) would certainly be sufficient grounds to allege a valid sexual harassment claim.  But I guess if this conduct happens at the Yolo County Sheriff's Office...it truly is Yolo...

Majority Opinion Judge:  Judge Nunley

Date:  November 5, 2014

Opinion:  http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=15073000648396664751&hl=en&as_sdt=6&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more