Skip to main content

Employee Sues Employer For Alleged Failure to Pay Overtime? Make Sure To Be Specific


Landers v. Quality Communications, Inc. - Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals


Facts:  Landers was employed by Quality Communications as a cable service installer.  He subsequently brought suit on behalf of himself and other similarly situated individuals, and alleged that Quality failed to pay him minimum wages and overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor and Standards Act ("FLSA").  Landers alleged that Quality failed to compensate him for all of the overtime hours he worked and/or the overtime rate at which he was paid was calculated using an incorrect rate, which apparently resulted in an overtime payment that was less than what was required by the FLSA.   

Quality filed a motion to dismiss the claim on the grounds that Landers failed to state a plausible claim for unpaid minimum wages.  The lower court granted the Quality's motion to dismiss the wage and hour claim.  

Holding:  The Ninth Circuit affirmed the lower court's ruling and held that it is not enough for a complainant under the FLSA to merely allege that the employer failed to pay the employees minimum wages or overtime wages.  Rather, the allegations must plausibly state the claim that the employer failed to pay minimum wages or overtime wages.  

The Ninth Circuit pointed out that when a party makes a claim for unpaid overtime wages, the claimant must allege that he/she worked more than forty hours in a given workweek without being compensated for the hours worked in excess of forty hours.  A claimant, at a minimum, would have to alleged facts that showed there was a specific week in which the claimant was entitled to, but was denied minimum wages or overtime wages.  In this case, Landers need not necessarily have detailed factual allegations regarding the number of overtime hours worked, but the conclusory allegations were not sufficient to prevail on his FLSA claim. 

Judgment:  The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's granting of Quality's motion to dismiss on the grounds that Landers conclusory allegations failed to allege facts which showed there was a specific week in which he was entitled to, but did not receive minimum wages or overtime wages. 

The Takeaway:  I think the Ninth Circuit got it right here.  Relying on a few older cases, the Court pointed to the fact that merely filing a complaint with conclusory statements that allege an employer's failure to pay minimum wages or overtime wages, likely is not sufficient to bring a valid FLSA claim.  For those employees looking at filing a similar suit, take note:  although detailed factual allegations are not necessarily required (but likely would not hurt), using conclusory statements in an attempt to prevail on an FLSA claim likely will not survive a motion to dismiss filed by the employer.

Majority Opinion Judge:  Judge Rawlinson

Date:  November 12, 2014

Opinion:  http://hr.cch.com/ELD/LandersQuality.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

Happening Tomorrow: Connecticut’s Minimum Wage Increases

For those employers and employees alike in Connecticut, mark your calendars as tomorrow, the minimum wage rate increases in the state from $13/hour to $14/hour. This wage hike comes after Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont had signed Public Act 19-4 into law in 2019 which progressively raised the state’s hourly minimum wage rate every year for five years.  In fact, next year, the hourly wage rate will top out at $15/hour.  Beginning in January of 2024, the hourly wage rate will be indexed to the employment cost index. For additional information:   https://portal.ct.gov/Office-of-the-Governor/News/Press-Releases/2022/06-2022/Governor-Lamont-Reminds-Residents-That-Minimum-Wage-Is-Scheduled-To-Increase-on-Friday
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more