Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Ebola is all over the news.  I can't seem to turn on the t.v. or go online without seeing some news article or commentary on it.  As a result, to kick off this week's What I've Been Reading blog, I found a few good articles on how ebola can impact the workplace and what employers can do to stay on top of the issue.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.



Of all the articles on ebola in the workplace that I read this week, this is one of the better articles on the topic.  Wisely, the article suggests that employers remain vigilant, not panic, and come up with a plan of action to deal with potential ebola issues.  I think the key take away in this article is to have a response plan and be proactive about dealing with possible issues that can come up.



Similar to the first article, this one by Howard Mavity has some good points about how employers can stay calm in the face of the increased attention on ebola and work through a plan of action to deal with the issue in the workplace.  Howard has a few thoughts on how employers can remain calm, deal with the issues, as well as how to handle employees who request time off in relation to ebola.  Very well thought out and easy to follow.



Let's take a step back to something a little less chaotic.  This article addresses employers who use social media to screen potential employees.  I like the suggestion to not be a stalker and respect privacy.  I have seen employers create fake Facebook accounts and try to "friend" potential employees so that the employer can get more information on that applicant.  That seems a bit much...  The pro/con list on using social media to screen potential employees that is included at the end is worth a quick review as well. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...