Skip to main content

Employee Shows Up Late/Leaves Early & You Want to Discipline Them? First, a Few Thoughts


Every employer has encountered it at one point or another:  one, several, or all of their employees show up late to work or leave early without prior approval.  It is one thing if time off has been requested or prior approval has been granted.  It is another thing when the employee is expected to be at work and simply shows up late or leaves early without getting approval to do so from their supervisor.  

Often, when an employer learns of an employee's tardiness or decision to leave early, the employer wants to immediately discipline that employee.  Before an employer acts, however, there are a few things to keep in mind:

  • Set out expectations clearly for each employee.  Has the employee been made aware of the employer's expectations on when to be in the office?  Employers should note that simply relying on the arguments of "employees should have known when to be here" or "they should have recognized when other employees were required to be here...the same rules applied to everyone" likely are insufficient.  If no expectations have been set out, it is often difficult to attempt to discipline an employee who shows up late or leaves early. 
  • Ensure that employees know who to report to in the event an emergency arises and they need to show up to work late or leave early.  It sounds simple enough, but you would be surprised how many employers do not establish a procedure for employees to follow in the event an emergency arises and the employee needs to show up late or leave work early.  If the employee does not know who to report to, or how to do it, it is difficult to discipline the employee for an unexcused absence.  As a result, make it clear on what an employee should do if an emergency arises that would disrupt their work schedule.
  • Make sure the employee handbook dictates how an employees' tardiness or decision to leave early will be addressed by the employer.  If the employer does not have an employee handbook, consider making one.  Does the employee handbook address how employee tardiness or decision to leave early will be addressed?  Some employers provide that before any disciplinary action is taken, the employee will receive a verbal or written warning.  If that is the case, follow what the employee handbook dictates.  No employee handbook?  Well, this might be a good time to implement one.
  • Not all employees will be disciplined the same way.  Consider the employee's job responsibilities and expectations before deciding what to do.  Are all employees treated the same way in regard to how tardiness or deciding to leave early is handled?  All employees of similar standing should be dealt with in the same way.  For instance, if a legal assistant routinely shows up to work late while one of the senior associates does as well, these employees might be dealt with differently.  The legal assistant likely needs to be in the office during 'normal' working hours to answer the phone, talk with court staff, and interact with opposing attorneys.  The senior associate though likely has more latitude to come in a little later as they can do work after hours at the office, at home, or on the road while traveling.  Note, I am not saying that anyone should get a free pass.  Rather, consider who is showing up late or leaving early when determining how to handle unexcused absences from the office.
  • Ensure that employees are disciplined evenly so as to avoid discrimination claims.  Employers need to ensure that any discipline of employees is done evenly across the board.  So long as the situation is the same without major differences (ie  a few paralegals routinely come in late every Monday morning without prior approval), one employee should not be more severely disciplined than the others.  Granted there are always extenuating circumstances and no two situations are the same, but employers need to be wary of possible claims of discrimination if one employee is routinely singled out above the others. 
  • Beware of time theft; if the employee is non-exempt and still getting paid for unexcused absences, that is a problem that must be addressed.  Is the employee an exempt or non-exempt employee?  If the employee is non-exempt and subject to overtime wages, the employer needs to be sure there is no "time theft" going on and the employee is not getting paid for time not actually spent working. 

Granted, this list is not exhaustive but provides employers a few things to keep in mind when determining how to discipline an employee who shows up to work late or leaves work early without prior approval. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations