Skip to main content

United Steelworkers of America Have Some Lofty Goals


Recently, the United Steelworkers of America held its annual convention and vowed to enact certain changes in the labor structure of America.  A few are nothing out of the ordinary, such as workers should have access to neutral voting locations and workers should have a right to a representation election within 30 days of filing a petition for one.  

However, the one that really jumped out at me was the goal to unseat Senator Bob Corker of Tennessee who spoke out against the UAW's presence at the Chattanooga Volkswagen plant.  For those who do not remember, earlier this year, workers at a Volkswagen plant in Cattanooga voted on whether to unionize.  (Volkswagen Vote - Reuters Report).  Amid the vote by the workers, Senator Corker made comments that many interpreted as influencing the vote.  Specifically, Senator Corker stated that he had "conversations" and based on those conversations was assured that should the workers vote against the UAW, Volkswagen would subsequently announce that it would manufacture new Volkswagens at that Chattanooga plant. 

It is no surprise that this riled the Steelworkers, so the goal to unseat him was probably a foregone conclusion, though Corker was re-elected in 2012 and will not be up for re-election until 2018.  In any event, it will be interesting to see if the Steelworkers are successful.  

Perhaps knowing the difficulty of prevailing on all of its goals, the Steelworkers did not set a date for when their goals will be met.


Additional information on the topic can be found here:  http://mattaustinlaborlaw.com/2014/09/30/steelworkers-playbook-on-how-they-plan-to-reform-labor-law/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...