Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


A couple good articles this week...my favorite being a warning to employers to not label workers as independent contractors rather than employees.  This is an issue I have seen start to come up more and more often lately.  As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


10 Ways Employers Can Offer Reasonable Accommodations to An Employee's Disability

Stephen Simpson has written one of the better articles that I have read in a while.  Disability laws require that an employer provide a reasonable accommodation to a disabled employee, if possible, and this article identifies ten different ways an employer can do just that.  The article also includes a case for each of the ten suggestions which make it more relate able and easy to follow.


Beware of Labeling Workers as 'Independent Contractors" Rather Than 'Employees'

Michael Haberman has a good article on the increased risks that have come up over the past few years for employers who label workers as 'independent contractors' rather than 'employees'.  As the article notes, this has become a big area of enforcement and one that employers should be wary of and pay close attention to.  Labeling a worker as an independent contractor rather than an employee can have big risks, should the government investigate and find the employer misidentified the worker.  Employers beware!


A Few Questions Employer Should Not Ask at Job Interviews

An article like this comes along often enough, but I always thinks it is a good idea for employers to review.  Daniel Schwartz has a few thoughts on questions employers should not ask during a job interview.  Some are common sense, but bonus points for the SNL clip at the end to really bring the point home.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more