Skip to main content

NCAA Again Caught Up In Student Athlete Compensation Issue: Former University of Houston Soccer Player Brings FLSA Suit for Compensation


Early last week, a former University of Houston soccer player filed a lawsuit on behalf of herself and Division I student athletes against the NCAA and all NCAA Division I member schools.  (Yes, that includes even my own alma matter...I will let you guess which one).  

The plaintiff alleged that the University of Houston violated the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") as she was an uncompensated student athlete and should have been classified as a temporary employee.  Note, if she had been classified as a temporary employee, she would have been entitled to receive compensation.  In essence, the lawsuit argues that students in work study programs (such as serving as ushers at sporting events, working at the library, washing dishes at the food halls, etc.) perform non-academic functions for the benefit of the NCAA and the schools.  As a result, these work study participants meet the criteria to be classified as part time temporary employees and therefore receive compensation.  The argument follows that since student athletes also perform non-academic functions, the student athletes are therefore part time temporary employees and subsequently entitled to be compensated by the school as required by the FLSA.  

Note, the other defendants are included on the grounds that they all conspired to set up a system where these student athletes are uncompensated.  Logical argument to make, as Division I schools do not compensate their student athletes. 

As for the issue of whether scholarships are "compensation, the lawsuit makes the argument that scholarships that are awarded to student athletes are not compensation and therefore not applicable for several reasons.  First, many scholarships are treated as grants and are not offered to every athlete.  As well, scholarships are often intended to defray the costs of attending school rather than be used solely as the student athlete chooses. 

Readers of the blog are aware of attempts by the Northwestern University football team to unionize earlier this year.  This is another example of student athletes attempting to distinguish themselves as not just students, but athletes entitled to compensation for their work.  Will it pay off?  I do not know.  But this will certainly not be the last time we hear about this type of issue.
 

A copy of the lawsuit can be found here:  http://ftpcontent2.worldnow.com/wthr/pdf/ncaalawsuit.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more