Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


In subsequent weeks, I will take some time to highlight dueling right to work ballot measures in Tennessee and Illinois this coming November.  For the time being, I want to whet the appetite of readers with a note about the ongoing effort to pass a right to work law in New Hampshire.  Spoiler alert:  many, many attempts have failed…but right to work proponents in the state appear to slowly be inching toward getting a legislative victory.  Maybe…

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.



In recent weeks, a Starbucks location in Houston voted to unionize.  Subsequently, Starbucks terminated a worker that had been paramount in leading that unionization effort.  Following that termination, workers at the Houston area Starbucks location went on strike, arguing the employee was unlawfully terminated as a result of his efforts to unionize the store.  As The Houston Chronicle reported, Starbucks has pushed back on that claim and stated the employee’s termination came about because of violations of the company’s attendance and punctuality policies.  Will this quell feelings among these workers (and others) that the termination was instead as a result of the employee’s unionization efforts?  In a word:  No.



Liz Young over at The Wall Street Journal recently wrote an article in which she noted that employers are proactively taking steps to make working in warehouses more desirable as companies fight over a tight labor pool.  The article notes that employers such as REI and McKesson have revamped their warehouses to include more natural light, fitness centers, and outdoor work areas in an effort to attract and retain workers.  This is quite a change from the dreary, rote compositions of many warehouses, to say the least.



Despite there appearing to be an appetite in New Hampshire to approve a statewide right to work law, with at least 30 attempts being made to pass legislation in the New Hampshire General Court (the state’s House and Senate), no successful bill has been approved.  As this article points out, recent attempts to pass a right to work law in 2017 and 2021 fell 32 votes and 24 votes, respectively.  This is noteworthy given Republicans have control of both the House and Senate.  However, slowly but surely, Republicans that have voted against the right to work legislation have either chosen not to run again or were voted out in primaries.  (In fact, of the 21 Republicans who voted against the right to work bill in 2021, less than half will return next year.)  This has led to accusations that outside money has come into the state to influence the elections and get Republicans elected that will approve a right to work bill.  Will New Hampshire become the next right to work state?  It is too soon to tell but it certainly appears it is trending in that direction.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more