Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


Anddddd, we are back.  I would hope that readers spent some time the past few weeks keeping up on recent labor and employment law updates.  For those that missed out, stay tuned as we highlight some noteworthy developments that have (and continue to) play out in the weeks ahead.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Starbucks Moves to Begin Negotiations With Unionized Workers

Recently, Starbucks sent letters to the more than 200 locations that have voted to unionize and requested contract negotiations begin this month.  Currently, Starbucks is negotiating with only three stores:  one in Buffalo, one in New York, and one in Arizona.  Will the union that is representing these Starbucks workers accept the invitation and begin negotiating this month?  Time will tell…


Striketober…Fact or Fiction?

One of the more nuanced topics of late is the concept of Striketober in which workers across the country are expected to go on strike.  (Striketober is apparently this month’s “Quiet Quitting”, for those familiar with such lingo.)  The theory goes that with an increase in unionization efforts over the past year (and a White House and Labor Department that are staunchly pro union), workers are feeling emboldened to go on strike for higher wages, better benefits, etc.  Are we going to see a wave of strikes this month?  While Micheal Sainato over at The Guardian seems to think so, this might be a wait and see situation.


Automation Coming to California Chipotle…Next Stop, Nationwide?

On the heels of a labor shortage in the fast food industry (and a potential increase in labor costs), Chipotle has taken steps to automate some portions of its stores.  At present, Chipotle is introducing “Chippy”, a robot that will make tortilla chips at a location in Fountain Valley, California.  Depending upon how Chippy performs, Chipotle has plans to expand this automation nationwide along with other related automation of other tasks.  I would expect other large scale fast food chains to follow suit in the coming months.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per