Skip to main content

Breaking: Rail Union Rejects Tentative Agreement; Strike Looms


Earlier this afternoon, the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Division (“BMWED”) announced that 56% of its workers had rejected a temporary agreement recently brokered by the Biden Administration.

What does this mean?  Let’s first take a step back.  In recent weeks, the Biden Administration sat major freight rail operators and unions down to hash out an agreement over a new labor contract.  While a tentative agreement was reached, there was hesitation over whether all parties (namely the workers) would validate and approve the deal.  Workers had long grumbled that they experienced poor working conditions and inadequate pay.  From their viewpoint, the tentative agreement did not allay those concerns.

Lo and behold, this afternoon’s news confirms as much.  With 56% of BMWED workers voting against the agreement, it appears any “victory lap” by the Biden Administration over a deal being reached is short lived.  At this point, there is a growing belief that a strike among rail workers will take place in the coming weeks, threatening to bring the economy to a screeching halt heading into the Christmas season.

I will note, that just because the tentative agreement has been struck down, that does not necessarily mean a strike will happen.  As suggested, while a strike appears imminent, and organized labor is certainly saber rattling, I expect all parties will come back to the bargaining table and restart negotiations in the coming weeks.  The Biden Administration is certainly likely to play a key role again as it seeks to right a shaky economy and seek a win headed into the midterms.

Buckle up thought, the next few weeks should prove to be rather bumpy.


For additional information:  https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/rail-union-rejects-labor-deal-brokered-biden-administration-whats-next-rcna51543

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per