Skip to main content

Labor Department Releases Proposal on Independent Contractor v Employee Classification


Last Tuesday, the Labor Department released its proposal on how workers should be classified in regard to being independent contractors or employees.

The proposal, which marks a stark contract from prior proposals from the Labor Department during President Donald Trump’s term, would dramatically shift things as currently set.  Under the proposal, a multi factor “economic realities” test would be utilized to determine whether a worker was an independent contractor or employee.  This new test, which would examine the totality of the circumstances, would involve equal consideration of a wide range of factors including investment by the worker and the employer, the degree of permanence of the working relationship, the extent to which the work performed is an integral part of the employer’s business, the degree of skill and initiate exhibited by the worker, the worker’s degree of control over their work, and the “opportunity for profit or loss” based on personal investment or initiative.  Notably, the proposal would allow for additional factors to be considered beyond these six if they indicate the worker may be in business for themselves.

(President Trump’s Labor Department had identified five factors to consider when examining whether a worker was an independent contractor or employee but emphasized two in particular:  1) A worker’s degree of control over their work and 2) “opportunity for profit or loss” based on personal investment or initiative as the two paramount factors to consider.)

Following the release of this proposal, employers such as Uber & Lyft criticized the new standard and argued it would lead to a rash of litigation and an overwhelming rise in labor cost to cover the workers being reclassified as employees rather than independent contractors.

Currently, the general public has time to comment on this proposal before it is amended or adopted.  If I were a betting man, I would expect this proposal to take effect as is (or with minimal changes.)


For a copy of the Labor Department’s proposed rule:  https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2022-21454.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more