Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


I come across ERISA articles and related lawsuits every so often.  Given the rather complex nature of these cases, I do not go too in depth, but enjoy skimming through them.  This week, I came across an update on three class action ERISA suits brought against MIT, NYU, and Yale that I think readers would enjoy.  Even for those who do not know much about ERISA, this article does a good job breaking down the basics of the case and what the grounds are for the suits.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Recent ERISA Suits Brought Against MIT, NYU, and Yale

As John Manganaro over at planadviser writes, three separate class action ERISA suits were filed against MIT, NYU, and Yale on the grounds that the universities breached their duty of loyalty and prudence under ERISA by causing plan participants to pay millions of dollars in "unreasonable and excessive fees" for record keeping, administrative, and investment services of the retirement plans.  For those who have experience with ERISA suits, this is well worth a read.  And for those readers who actively avoid ERISA suits like the plague, this is still an article worth reviewing.


Walmart's Success Story On the Employment Front

TheStreet has an in depth look at how Walmart has taken major steps as of late in regard to its employees.  Of note, for workers hired before January 1st of this year, the hourly minimum wage rate is at least $10/hour (up from $9/hour).  In addition, the company has given out bonuses in excess of $200 million to its workers this year.  Well worth a read to see how Walmart has taken steps to become one of the more "employee friendly" employers this year.


California Passes New Transgender Protection Law In Regard to Single-User Restrooms

In late September, California Governor Jerry Brown signed into law AB 1732 which will require single-user restrooms in California businesses, government buildings, and places of public accommodation to be universally acceptable to all genders.  Employers in California take note:  This expansive law, set to take effect March 1, 2017, authorizes public inspectors or building officials to check for compliance during any inspection.


Congress Takes Action to Delay Implementation of New Overtime Rules

Recently, Congress passed H.R. 6094 (aka "the Regulatory Relief for Small Businesses, Schools, and Nonprofits Act") which provides a sixth month delay of the implementation of the Department of Labor's new overtime rules.  This is quite a development, and something that I think readers should pay close attention to as this develops further.  Note, this legislation does not prevent the implementation of the new overtime rules.  In essence, it is simply delaying the inevitable.  Employers should take note that even though they have additional time to comply with the new overtime rules, this is not a free pass for them to disregard the rules entirely...instead, employers will now have until June 1, 2017 to comply.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more