Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


I come across ERISA articles and related lawsuits every so often.  Given the rather complex nature of these cases, I do not go too in depth, but enjoy skimming through them.  This week, I came across an update on three class action ERISA suits brought against MIT, NYU, and Yale that I think readers would enjoy.  Even for those who do not know much about ERISA, this article does a good job breaking down the basics of the case and what the grounds are for the suits.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Recent ERISA Suits Brought Against MIT, NYU, and Yale

As John Manganaro over at planadviser writes, three separate class action ERISA suits were filed against MIT, NYU, and Yale on the grounds that the universities breached their duty of loyalty and prudence under ERISA by causing plan participants to pay millions of dollars in "unreasonable and excessive fees" for record keeping, administrative, and investment services of the retirement plans.  For those who have experience with ERISA suits, this is well worth a read.  And for those readers who actively avoid ERISA suits like the plague, this is still an article worth reviewing.


Walmart's Success Story On the Employment Front

TheStreet has an in depth look at how Walmart has taken major steps as of late in regard to its employees.  Of note, for workers hired before January 1st of this year, the hourly minimum wage rate is at least $10/hour (up from $9/hour).  In addition, the company has given out bonuses in excess of $200 million to its workers this year.  Well worth a read to see how Walmart has taken steps to become one of the more "employee friendly" employers this year.


California Passes New Transgender Protection Law In Regard to Single-User Restrooms

In late September, California Governor Jerry Brown signed into law AB 1732 which will require single-user restrooms in California businesses, government buildings, and places of public accommodation to be universally acceptable to all genders.  Employers in California take note:  This expansive law, set to take effect March 1, 2017, authorizes public inspectors or building officials to check for compliance during any inspection.


Congress Takes Action to Delay Implementation of New Overtime Rules

Recently, Congress passed H.R. 6094 (aka "the Regulatory Relief for Small Businesses, Schools, and Nonprofits Act") which provides a sixth month delay of the implementation of the Department of Labor's new overtime rules.  This is quite a development, and something that I think readers should pay close attention to as this develops further.  Note, this legislation does not prevent the implementation of the new overtime rules.  In essence, it is simply delaying the inevitable.  Employers should take note that even though they have additional time to comply with the new overtime rules, this is not a free pass for them to disregard the rules entirely...instead, employers will now have until June 1, 2017 to comply.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more