Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: Age Discrimination Edition


Age discrimination is a topic that I come across every so often, but not a lot of cases/developments jump out.  With that being said, given a recent age discrimination related ruling from the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals and two recent age discrimination suits filed against Tesla and Google, I think this is a good time to devote attention to the topic.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


11th Circuit Holds "Subtle" Age Discrimination Lawful (For John Applicants)

Earlier this month, the 11th Circuit held that subtle age discrimination is lawful in regard to the hiring of job applicants.  According to the Court of Appeals, job applicants cannot benefit from the disparate impact provision of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA").  Instead, only employees are entitled to protections under the ADEA.  Noah Feldman over at Bloomberg breaks down the Court's ruling well and points out how the Court arrived at the somewhat surprising decision.  As Noah writes, this could be a case that ends up in the Supreme Court.  It certainly would not surprise me if that is the case.


Age Discrimination Suit Filed Against Tesla

Brittany Roston recently wrote a good article that addresses a recent age discrimination suit filed against Tesla by a former engineer.  In the suit, the former engineer claimed he was subjected to harsher treatment than his younger peers, that supervisors repeatedly singled him out, and reportedly cancelled scheduled meetings, among other complained of conduct.  The suit further alleged the engineer was ultimately fired because of his age.  Interesting case to say the least...keep an eye on this one to see how it plays out.



An age discrimination suit has been brought against Google by two software engineers who applied for positions with Google and were interviewed, although ultimately were not offered jobs.  Earlier this month, the judge in the case ruled that software engineers over the age of 40 who interviewed with Google but did not get hired can join the suit.  This ruling turns the suit into a class action and could increase the number of plaintiffs exponentially.  Google has indicated it will fight the suit...but this one is far from over.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more