Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: A Look Back Edition


There are always a few articles that I write about which I suggest readers keep an eye on down the road.  Some of my posts that I suggest readers follow up on focus on legislative bills or amendments, while others deal with pending employment and labor law issues in courts across the country.  This week, I wanted to take a look back at some big employment and labor law related issues that have recent updates which I think readers would enjoy.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


Buffalo Bills Cheerleader Suit Continues After N.F.L.'s Motion Denied

The Buffalo News has an article from earlier this month and details a recent decision by a judge to deny the N.F.L's request to dismiss the league from the Buffalo Bills cheerleaders' wage and hour lawsuit.  (Buffalo Bills Cheerleaders File Wage & Hour Suit).  The N.F.L. had argued that it was not an employer of the cheerleaders and was not responsible for the pay/alleged misclassification of the the cheerleaders.  The judge did not agree and held that since discovery had not yet been conducted, the N.F.L.'s motion was premature.  This one has a ways to go still, but still an interesting update on the continuing saga of these wage and hour lawsuits against several N.F.L. teams.



Late last week, the Illinois House voted on Governor Bruce Rauner's proposed right to work zones.  For those keeping score at home, House Speaker Michael Madigan had previously stated he would bring the matter to a vote, even though no formal legislation had been submitted by the Governor.  (Updated - May 14th Right to Work Vote Called For By Illinois House Speaker).  As expected, the right to work plan was voted down 0-72-37 with all Democrats casting "no" votes, and all Republicans, except one, casting "present" votes as a protest to the "political sham".  At this stage, the right to work zone proposal is at a stopping point, but the Governor could still submit formal legislation before the legislative session is up later this month.


Judge Denies Attempt to Block $15.37 Minimum Wage Increase for Los Angeles Hotel Workers

Last week, U.S. District Judge Andre Birotte Jr. denied a request by the American Hotel and Lodging Association and the Asian American Hotel Owners Association to issue an injunction to block the city's hotel worker wage increase while litigation is pending.  For those who remember, late last year, the Los Angeles City Council approved an increase in minimum wage for hotel workers in the city to $15.37/hour.  (Hotel Workers In Los Angeles To Receive $15.37/Hour).  Unsurprisingly, he American Hotel and Lodging Association and the Asian American Hotel Owners Association filed a suit in December seeking to stop the minimum wage from going into effect.  (Two Trade Groups Seek to Block $15.37 Minimum Wage Increase).  While the judge's ruling does not directly impact the suit filed by the trade groups, it allows the minimum wage increase to go into effect in July without delay.  This is one to continue to keep an eye on!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per