Skip to main content

Barstool Sports Bloggers Arrested for Protesting Brady Suspension: Can Employees Be Forced to Participate in Illegal Activity?


Last week, four bloggers from Barstool Sports were arrested at N.F.L. headquarters in New York for staging a sit in as a response to the N.F.L.'s suspension and fines associated with "Deflategate".  The owner of the company, David Portnoy, brought along three employees and engaged in a protest in front of the building, then later handcuffed themselves inside the lobby of the building and chanted pro-Tom Brady and anti-NFL messages.  Unsurprisingly, and as they had predicted before going to protest at N.F.L. headquarters, the NYPD arrested all four and held them overnight before going before a judge the next morning.  

While all four maintained that they protested and were arrested without being forced to participate, this begs the question:  What does an employee do when their employer forces them to engage in illegal activity?  

In this case, the employees who joined Portnoy had to know that once they handcuffed themselves in the N.F.L. lobby and refused to leave, they would be arrested for trespass.  While none of the employees appeared to have been forced to join, they had to know that they would engage in illegal activity at the direction of their boss.  Had one of them refused to participate, it is possible that they could have been subjected to discipline or termination by Portnoy.  If that had happened, one of these Barstool employees could have a claim for wrongful termination.  Note, an employer cannot force an employee to engage in illegal activity.  An employee who refuses to engage in illegal activity and then is subsequently terminated for failing to participate has grounds to sue their employer for an unlawful termination.

While this story might be humorous and an example of taking things a little too far (I doubt four guys handcuffed and sitting in the N.F.L. lobby is going to reverse a suspension and fine...but that's just me), it is a good reminder for employers and employees alike:  Directing employees to undertake certain actions or perform specific job related tasks is likely ok.  However, when an employee is instructed to participate in an illegal activity and refuses, employers should be very careful about taking adverse employment actions against that employee. 


Coverage from Barstool Sports:  http://www.barstoolsports.com/chicago/justice/


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more