Skip to main content

Illinois' House Speaker Calls for May 14th Vote on Right to Work Zones


Last week, Illinois' House Speaker Michael Madigan announced he had scheduled a May 14th vote on Governor Bruce Rauner's proposed right to work zones.  

For those who might not remember, in April, Governor Rauner proposed right to work zones in which individual communities could vote on whether to be right to work zones.  (Illinois Governor Proposes Right to Work Zones).  Unlike 25 other states which have passed state-wide right to work laws, this proposal would allow individual communities to decide whether or not employees should be forced to join a union or pay union dues as a condition of employment.  As I had noted previously, in a union friendly and liberal leaning state like Illinois, state-wide right to work legislation likely would not pass.  As a result, these proposed right to work zones are an interesting way of allowing parts of the state to adopt these laws without going through the process of trying to get a state-wide bill passed.

However, even with the upcoming vote in the Illinois House, the Governor has yet to submit a formal bill to the legislature.  As expected, Democrats are using this vote, as they have done with other proposed initiatives from the Governor, for a very simple reason:  Use the lack of votes for the Governor's proposals as leverage to show the Governor (and grand stand for their constituents) that these proposals do not have the votes to pass and do not represent the best interests of Illinois residents.  

Keep in mind that the Illinois House is made up of 71 Democrats and 47 Republicans.  Even if the House approved these right to work zones, a vote would still be needed by the Senate (which is also controlled by Democrats, 39 to 20) before it would reach the Governor's desk.  This is certainly something to keep an eye on this week.


For additional information, follow the link:  http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20150507/NEWS02/150509845/madigan-calls-vote-on-right-to-work-legislation

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more