Skip to main content

Employee Fails to Disclose Disability Until After They Are Fired? Good Luck With That ADA Claim...


Lucas v. Gregg Appliances, Inc. - United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Western District


Facts:  Chris Lucas ("Lucas") suffered from paruesis (shy bladder syndrome).  As a result, he claimed he could not urinate in public bathrooms and would hold his bladder throughout the work day to avoid having to use the bathroom at work.  Lucas's employer, Gregg Appliances ("Gregg") maintained a drug free workplace which required periodic drug testing of employees.  

When Luis was promoted to general manager, the position was contingent upon him passing a drug test.  When Lucas could not complete the drug test (because of his shy bladder), the testing clinic reported to Greg "PER COLLECTOR:  DONOR LEFT COLLECTION SITE BEFORE COMPLETION OF DRUG TEST."  When management confronted Lucas, he did not mention his difficulty urinating or his paruresis.  Lucas did not vist a physician for the condition until the day after Gregg fired him for failing o take the required drug test. 

Lucas subsequently brought an Americans with Disabilities ("ADA") claim against Gregg on the grounds that he was terminated because of his disability and Gregg failed to accommodate the disability.  Both parties moved for summary judgment. 

Holding:  The District Court granted Gregg's motion for summary judgment on the grounds that it had no knowledge of Lucas's disability.  The facts demonstrated that Lucas never told anyone at Gregg about his disability before taking the drug test or even after he failed to complete the test.  In fact, Lucas only informed Gregg about his disability after he was terminated.  As the Court noted, when a disability is not obvious, the burden is on the employee to make the employer aware of the disability. 

In addition, the Court held that the burden rested with the employee to request a reasonable accommodation.  In this instance, Lucas failed to request a reasonable accommodation until after he had been terminated.  As the Court held, when an employee fails to request a reasonable accommodation during his employment, he cannot later complain that the employer failed to provide an accommodation.

Judgment:  The Court granted Gregg's motion for summary judgment on the grounds that it had no knowledge of Lucas's disability and Lucas's failure to inform his employer of his disability and request a reasonable accommodation doomed his ADA claim. 

The Takeaway:  Employees take note, if you do not make your employer aware of a disability and request a reasonable accommodation, your ADA claim is likely to fail.  As this Court noted, the ADA does not require the employer to "guess" and play detective as to what disabilities their employees suffer from.  Note, whichever party fails to take part in a conversation about the disability and the accommodation is likely to be staring at the barrel of an ADA suit. 

Majority Opinion Judge:  Judge Black

Date:  April 15, 2015

Opinion:  https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2501102956069465697

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more