Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


Regular readers of the blog likely haven taken note of the (major) increase in labor law developments to close out 2022.  With all of those developments, it would be wrong of me to gloss over those highlights and not give them the attention they deserve.  With that being said, I also wanted to look at the other side of the coin this week.  While I read through a few compelling articles on labor law related matters (and noted an article about the unionization effort at Starbucks), I am highlighting a few employment law and HR related topics for readers to page through in the coming days.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Survey: App Based Workers Prefer to Be Classified As Independent Contractors

Back in September, a survey was conducted among 1,251 app based workers to get their input on whether they prefer to be classified as independent contractors or instead classified as employees.  By a somewhat surprising 77%, those app based workers surveyed indicated they strongly support (or somewhat support) being classified as independent contractors.  While it is difficult to read into their reasoning, it could be those app based workers that were polled prefer the flexibility of being classified as independent contractors (as opposed to the more stringent and regimented routine that employees typically have) or it could be these app based workers fear that companies would start slashing their staff if app based workers were classified as employees.  Although this survey is not the definitive gauge on what all app based workers want, it is worth paging through for a bit of insight on the matter.


A Concise Breakdown of Minimum Wage Rates Across the Country

Every so often, I have to stop and take a moment to look up a minimum wage rate in a particular state (as readers will likely know that minimum wage rates vary in each state.)  Clare Mulroy over at USA Today recently published an overview of the current wage rates in all 50 states (and D.C.).  Even though some of these wage rates will change at the start of next year, this breakdown is still worth a quick review and reference for later.


Unionization Efforts at Starbucks Grinds Forward

Starbucks.  Unionization.  Elections.  Contested Ballots.  Strikes.  National Labor Relations Board complaints.  Etc.  Etc.  Readers are well aware of the long, hard fought battle at Starbucks over the past year in regard to workers taking steps to unionize.  Noam Scheiber at The New York Times took a closer look at where things currently stand on this front:  Over 250 stores have voted to unionize nationwide, however election filings have slowed to a mere trickle in recent months.  Both the union that is representing workers at Starbucks and the company itself are slowly circling each other in anticipation of bargaining over an agreement.  The union wants better pay and benefits and a promise from the company to remain neutral in future elections (among other demands).  To achieve those demands, it is suspected (if not expected) that workers will take steps to strike and exert their influence on the company.  Will Starbucks accede to these demands or play hardball?   

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more