Skip to main content

San Diego Weighs Tripling Paid Parental Leave For City Employees


Earlier this month, San Diego City Councilmember Raul Campillo submitted a proposal to San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria in which it has been proposed that city employees would get twelve weeks of paid parental leave (or fourteen weeks if there was a complication during delivery.)

This proposal, which would dramatically increase the amount of paid parental leave currently offered to city employees (four weeks as of this writing), seeks to put San Diego city employees in a class of their own.  Notably, California has a state law in place which offers new parents six weeks of partially paid leave and another six weeks of unpaid leave.

Of course, many readers are likely wondering what this twelve weeks of paid parental leave would end up costing.  That is where things might get tricky.  Currently, San Diego’s paid leave program costs the city $1.5 million/year.  Campillo’s proposal would hike that cost to $5 - $6 million/year.  However, Campillo has suggested that offering twelve weeks of paid leave would decrease staff turnover and overtime (thus helping the city recoup some of the additional cost.)

Now to get approved, Mayor Gloria can approve it without the City Council needing to get involved.  However, that would involve Mayor Gloria needing to negotiate with city unions on the proposed twelve weeks of paid leave and the City Council ultimately having to vote on and approve any new labor agreements.  

While this proposal is far from the finish line, it is worth keeping an eye on in the weeks and months ahead.


For additional information:  https://www.kpbs.org/news/local/2022/10/24/san-diego-councilman-proposes-generous-parental-leave-city-employees

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more