Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


Perhaps this could of been an Amazon dedicated post if not for the first article I highlighted   With that being said, all three articles are worth a read and provide a few different topics were noting.  Whether readers are interested in union elections or workplace coronavirus policies, I would suggest giving all three articles a read.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Seattle City Council Passes Resolution Supporting Unionization Efforts at Starbucks

In a resolution that is really nothing more than a symbolic gesture, the Seattle City Council approved a resolution in which it expressed its support for unionization efforts at three Seattle area Starbucks locations.  The resolution passed last Tuesday 6 - 0 although several Councilmembers did not vote.  There was some disagreement among Councilmembers about what role, if any, the City Council should play in matters such as this which impact private businesses and that was not directly city business.  Given that this resolution has no “teeth” and is merely symbolic, I tend to agree with some that have suggested the City Council would have been better served spending time instead addressing crime, homelessness, and the city’s budget, instead of passing this resolution.


Two U.S. Senators Seek Answers on Second Election at Amazon Warehouse

Readers might recall that workers at an Amazon warehouse in Bessemer, Alabama had previously voted against unionization during a mail in election.  However, after complaints were raised about the first election (namely the argument that Amazon’s decision to set up a mailbox at the workplace to allow workers to drop off their mail in ballots tainted the election), a second election was ordered by the National Labor Relations Board.  In doing so, the second mail in election is currently underway with ballots due no later than March 28th.  However, two U.S. Senators, Tommy Tuberville (from Alabama) and Richard Burr (from North Carolina) have sent a list of questions to the NLRB Regional Director that ordered the second election, seeking to get clarification on the grounds for why the second election was ordered.  With responses to the questions requested back by February 22nd, it will be interesting to see what responses, if any, are provided.


Amazon Amends Coronavirus Related Workplace Policies

In an about face, Amazon announced that effective March 8th, it will no longer provide paid leave for workers that get the coronavirus and need to take time off work, but have not received the coronavirus vaccine.  (Workers that get the coronavirus but have received the vaccine will still qualify for paid leave, however.)  Amazon also announced that starting last Friday, vaccinated workers will no longer be required to wear face masks inside warehouses, so long as local regulations allow.)  I would expect other large scale employers to follow Amazon’s lead and amend their coronavirus related policies in the coming weeks and months.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more