Skip to main content

The Final Whistle: USWNT’s Equal Pay Lawsuit Ends With $24 Million Settlement


Earlier this morning, it was announced that the USWNT’s equal pay lawsuit that had been filed against the U.S. Soccer Federation has reached a final resolution with a reported $24 million settlement.

Readers might recall that the equal pay lawsuit filed by these soccer players garnered widespread media attention when it was filed back in 2019.  The lawsuit sought back pay totaling around $66 million.  (The lawsuit also included a claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  That Title VII claim, which complained of disparate treatment in regard to things such as travel and lodging (in comparison to the USMNT) was previously settled.)

Getting to this stage has been a long haul, including a prior dismissal of the equal pay lawsuit during the summary judgment phase.  U.S. District Court Judge Gary Klausner dismissed the equal pay lawsuit on the grounds that during the period in question, the USWNT actually made more money per game compared to the USMNT.  The USWNT’s request to reinstate the equal pay portion of the lawsuit was set to be heard early next month, but with this settlement, that argument will not take place.

In regard to the specifics here, $22 million of the settlement will go toward the players that joined the lawsuit.  The other $2 million of the settlement will go toward helping players in their post playing careers as well as go toward charitable endeavors meant to help grow the sport among women.  The settlement also includes the U.S. Soccer Federation agreeing to an equal rate of pay for the USMNT and USWNT in all friendlies and tournaments (including the World Cup).

At this point, a few things need to happen before this settlement is finalized.  First, the USWNT will need to ratify a new collective bargaining agreement.  In addition, the Court in which this case is pending will have to approve the settlement.  (For those unfamiliar with cases in federal court, while the parties may agree to a resolution outside of Court, the Judge must still approve the settlement for it to take effect.)

For the time being, however, I would say the final whistle has blown on this case and it should be finalized in the coming months with this $24 million settlement.


For additional information:  https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2022/02/22/uswnt-equal-pay-settlement/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more