Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


This week (and this year) have been somewhat labor centric.  With that being said, the two articles I highlight this week are worth a read even for those not as interested in labor law.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.



Recently, a task force created by President Joe Biden that was directed to find ways to boost union membership and collective bargaining among private and public employees has released approximately 70 steps the Biden administration can take.  As Noam Scheiber at The New York Times writes, those steps include allowing union organizers to have access to workers on federal property, creating preferences in federal grant and loan programs for employers with strong labor standards, and prohibiting employers from using federal contract money on anti union campaigns. For an administration that is in desperate need of good news on the labor front, it will be interesting to see if these proposed steps from the task force lead to a recognizable (and sustained) boost in union membership.



I think it is fair to say that halfway through February, the big labor & employment law story of 2022 has been the ongoing unionization efforts at various Starbucks across the country.  As this article from The Huffington Post notes, Starbucks is locked in an intense battle with the union seeking to represent Starbucks workers.  That union, Starbucks Workers United, has notched a few victories including the successful unionization at two Buffalo area locations as well as securing elections elsewhere around the country.  I refer readers to this article for more information about how Starbucks has been trying to curb the wave of unionization at the company.  So far, those efforts to stymie unionization are mixed, to say the least given that workers at 54 locations in 19 states (and counting) have made moves to unionize.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more