Skip to main content

Happening Today: U.S. Supreme Court Set to Hear Arguments In Vaccine Mandate Cases


Today, the U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear arguments in two vaccine mandate cases currently pending before the Court.

The first case deals with a mandate issued by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration that requires employers with 100 or more employees either require coronavirus vaccines as a condition of employment or require unvaccinated employees submit to weekly testing and mandatory mask wearing in the workplace.  As readers might recall, this mandate was previously stayed by the Sixth Circuit but later that stay was lifted.  The U.S. Supreme Court subsequently took up the appeal afterward.

The second case deals with a mandate issued by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services that requires healthcare workers at hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers, nursing homes, and other healthcare facilities that receive Medicare or Medicaid funds to receive the coronavirus vaccine or risk being terminated.  This mandate has been halted in about half the states while it remains in effect in approximately the other half.  The U.S. Supreme Court subsequently took up the appeal given this split among Circuits.

Now as a reminder, the Court is not issuing a ruling on either case today.  Today is only for oral arguments before eventual decisions are issued by the Justices.  However, heading into today’s arguments, it is too soon to predict which way the Court will rule on either case.  For those that follow today’s arguments, I would suggest you pay attention to the questions (and the tenor of the questions) from the Justices.  While that does not necessarily indicate which way a particular Justice will rule, it can be indicative of which way a particular Justice might lean.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more