Skip to main content

Breaking: U.S. Supreme Court Issues Rulings in Vaccine Mandate Cases


That did not take long, did it?  Only a few short days after the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments on two coronavirus vaccine mandate cases, we have the Court’s rulings.

Let us start first with the case that dealt with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) requirement that employers with 100 or more employees would be required to have their employees either get the coronavirus vaccine or submit to weekly testing.  For those employees that were not vaccinated, they were required to wear masks while in the workplace.  In a 6 - 3 ruling, the Supreme Court held that while Congress had given OSHA to regulate dangers in the workplace, OSHA did not have Congressional authority to regulate public health measures more broadly.  Consequently, a majority of the Court struck down this mandate.

However, one thing to keep in mind is that an employer, on their own volition, can still require their employees get the vaccine (unless there is a contract or collective bargaining agreement that would require a bargaining process before such a policy was created.)  What today’s ruling from the Court does is say that the federal government cannot mandate this, at least in this instance based upon how OSHA tried to write and enact this particular mandate…despite the fact that employers could still do so at their own will.

The second case centered on a requirement that healthcare workers at facilities that receive Medicare or Medicaid get the coronavirus vaccine as a condition of employment, unless there was a medical or religious exemption.  In a narrow 5 - 4 ruling, the Court upheld this requirement on the grounds that the requirement, issued by the Health & Human Services, was within the scope of authority provided by Congress.

For those for or against coronavirus vaccine mandates, today’s rulings are both a win and a loss.  With that being said, the vaccine mandate for large employers getting struck down is likely to impact more workers across the country.  The question now to consider is whether Congress will attempt to confer additional authority to OSHA in an effort to circumvent today’s ruling and ultimately implement a vaccine mandate for large scale employers?  Something tells me that even with Democrats having majority control of Congress, that would be no easy task and therefore unlikely.


For additional information:   https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/13/supreme-court-ruling-biden-covid-vaccine-mandates.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more