Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


It has been a while since there has been a relevant right to work update.  This week, a development out of Tennessee is worth noting.  How things will play out remains to be seen.  However, if I were a betting man, I would wager that state’s right to work law will eventually be enshrined in the Tennessee Constitution.  Will it happen this go around?  Stay tuned. 

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.



Recently, Tennessee Governor Bill Lee announced he was leading the “Yes on 1” committee which is seeking to get a ballot initiative before voters next year that would enshrine the state’s right to work law into the Tennessee Constitution.  While Tennessee is already a right to work state, a change in the political makeup in the state could see that right to work law rescinded.  Placing it in the Tennessee Constitution would “protect” it a bit more by making it more permanent and tougher to repeal.  (A repeal would take another ballot initiative…rather than just the Tennessee Legislature amending/rescinding the law.)



As Greg Iacurci at CNBC writes, four states have approved paying unemployment benefits to workers that are terminated for failing to get the coronavirus vaccine.  Governors in Florida, Iowa, Tennessee, and Kansas have recently signed these laws with many expecting other states (conservative leaning if I were to guess) to possibly follow suit.  As the article notes, this development is somewhat unique as most states do not offer unemployment benefits to workers that are terminated for failing to follow workplace policies.  However, as with anything (including the coronavirus vaccine mandates) this is a unique situation that perhaps deserves a unique response.  Might some readers agree?



Readers might recall that about 1,400 unionized Kellogg’s workers went on strike after failing to reach an agreement with the company over a new collective bargaining agreement.  While there had been some hope that the strike would end after negotiations back and forth between the sides, earlier this week it was announced that the striking workers have rejected the latest proposal from the company which would have seen the workers receive a 3% raise.  That begs the question, where do things go from here?  For the company, they have indicated they will look to hire permanent replacements for the striking workers.  For the striking workers...well, they remain on strike but an agreement could eventually be reached between the parties.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more