Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


It has been a while since there has been a relevant right to work update.  This week, a development out of Tennessee is worth noting.  How things will play out remains to be seen.  However, if I were a betting man, I would wager that state’s right to work law will eventually be enshrined in the Tennessee Constitution.  Will it happen this go around?  Stay tuned. 

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.



Recently, Tennessee Governor Bill Lee announced he was leading the “Yes on 1” committee which is seeking to get a ballot initiative before voters next year that would enshrine the state’s right to work law into the Tennessee Constitution.  While Tennessee is already a right to work state, a change in the political makeup in the state could see that right to work law rescinded.  Placing it in the Tennessee Constitution would “protect” it a bit more by making it more permanent and tougher to repeal.  (A repeal would take another ballot initiative…rather than just the Tennessee Legislature amending/rescinding the law.)



As Greg Iacurci at CNBC writes, four states have approved paying unemployment benefits to workers that are terminated for failing to get the coronavirus vaccine.  Governors in Florida, Iowa, Tennessee, and Kansas have recently signed these laws with many expecting other states (conservative leaning if I were to guess) to possibly follow suit.  As the article notes, this development is somewhat unique as most states do not offer unemployment benefits to workers that are terminated for failing to follow workplace policies.  However, as with anything (including the coronavirus vaccine mandates) this is a unique situation that perhaps deserves a unique response.  Might some readers agree?



Readers might recall that about 1,400 unionized Kellogg’s workers went on strike after failing to reach an agreement with the company over a new collective bargaining agreement.  While there had been some hope that the strike would end after negotiations back and forth between the sides, earlier this week it was announced that the striking workers have rejected the latest proposal from the company which would have seen the workers receive a 3% raise.  That begs the question, where do things go from here?  For the company, they have indicated they will look to hire permanent replacements for the striking workers.  For the striking workers...well, they remain on strike but an agreement could eventually be reached between the parties.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more