Skip to main content

Amazon Warehouse Workers Get Second Bite At the Apple In Union Election


Earlier this year, a union election was held at an Amazon warehouse in Bessemer, Alabama.  That election was heavily contested by Amazon as the company sought to keep the plant workers from unionizing.  As readers might recall, the election did not work out well for those hoping to unionize the Amazon warehouse.  

After the election results were announced, a challenge was launched by the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union (which sought to unionize the warehouse) claiming the election results were tainted as Amazon improperly pressured workers to vote against unionizing by “gaslighting” workers through “egregious and blatantly illegal action.”  One major point of contention was Amazon’s decision to install a mail receptacle on the job premises to allow the workers to submit their ballots.  (After all, this was a mail in election rather than in person.)  In August, a hearing officer for the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) found that Amazon violated federal labor law and recommended a new election take place.

As it turns out, that is exactly what is going to happen after the Regional Director for the NLRB last week issued a 20 page order affirming that Amazon violated federal labor law and ordering a second election take place.  In the order, the Regional Director noted that Amazon’s decision to place a mail receptacle at the job site could lead workers to thinking Amazon was trying to control the election process and that the election was not truly impartial.  Frankly, I think this reasoning is wrong as it seems to suggest that workers at the warehouse location could be easily “hoodwinked” into thinking that a mail receptacle at the job site meant that the employer was somehow commandeering the vote counting or election procedures.  I give the warehouse workers more credit in this case and think that many/most/if not all the workers likely did not correlate a mail receptacle at the job site to receive ballots meant that Amazon was “running the show.”

I digress though.  With this new election, the union will have another chance to unionize the Bessemer location.  While no date has been set (or whether this will be a mail in election, in person, or some sort of hybrid), I would pay close attention to this one in the coming weeks and months.


For additional information:  https://apps.nlrb.gov/link/document.aspx/09031d458350f488

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more